18 Dec 2003
YUNG YING LING v. MIRAMAR HOTEL & INVESTMENT CO LTD
- Citation
- YUNG YING LING v. MIRAMAR HOTEL & INVESTMENT CO LTD
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Case number
- HCA196/2001
The court accepted the plaintiff's credibility and the contemporaneous documentary and conduct evidence (employment record card, 1985 provident fund statement referring to 1968, holiday pay record, contribution rate) and held that Albert Young had authority to bind Miramar in 1978; the oral secondment agreement therefore preserved continuity of service from 1968 to retirement and clause 6 of the 1985 document did not retrospectively defeat the claim; judgment entered for plaintiff for the claimed sum with interest and costs.