22 Nov 2024
CS v. HKR
- Citation
- [2024] HKCFI 3366
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Case number
- HCCT72/2024
Leave to appeal refused because (1) Question 1 and Question 4 were predominantly factual or mixed questions and the tribunal's factual findings (including agreed tender change to 100% sand and findings on delay/progress) could not be shown to be 'obviously wrong'; (2) Question 2 involved competing expert methodologies and the tribunal permissibly accepted parts of one expert's valuation over another; (3) Question 3 was not a question submitted to the tribunal as the alleged double recovery was not raised in arbitration; accordingly none of the s6(4) cumulative criteria were satisfied and leav…