19 Nov 2021
香港特別行政區 訴 劉天才
- Citation
- [2021] HKCFI 3431
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Case number
- HCMA156/2021
The court upheld the conviction because the accepted evidence (photographs, stationary position of the other vehicle, road geometry and conditions, daylight, absence of other vehicles, and the appellant's admission of speed) permitted only the irresistible inference that the appellant failed to keep proper care and attention; the trial judge lawfully weighed the mixed cautioned statement and applied the correct standard of proof; therefore prosecution proved the offence beyond reasonable doubt.