14 Mar 1986
YU HUNG KAR AND OTHERS v. PETER KEE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY
- Citation
- YU HUNG KAR AND OTHERS v. PETER KEE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Case number
- HCLA38/1985
The Presiding Officer did not commit an error of law; omission of explanatory remarks from the notes does not conclusively prove no explanation was given, s.19 does not prima facie require recording the tribunal's explanations, s.22(2) permits oral reasons, and the tribunal's exercise of discretion in dismissing the review was one a reasonable tribunal could reach; appeal dismissed.