4 Jul 2022
香港特別行政區 訴 玉炳健及另一人
- Citation
- [2022] HKCFI 1755
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Case number
- HCMA97/2020
Trial judge correctly admitted the interview as voluntary, reasonably rejected defendants' exculpatory accounts after assessing credibility and circumstantial evidence (seized cards, cash, conduct of exchanger, discrepancies at cashier), and properly inferred first appellant's knowledge and role; second appellant failed to produce credible evidence under s19(3) to rebut prosecution case; therefore convictions and the first appellant's immediate six‑week sentence were lawful and appropriate.