2 Sept 2015
HKSAR v. NGOMA JUMA SHABANI
- Citation
- HKSAR v. NGOMA JUMA SHABANI
- Court
- Court of Appeal
- Case number
- CACC214/2014
On the evidence (Summary of Facts, antecedent statement and admissions) the court was entitled to infer on the balance of probabilities that the US$4,500 was at least used in connection with drug trafficking (or was the result/product) and, having rejected the appellant's innocent explanation, the judge properly ordered forfeiture under s56(1) even though he did not specify which subsection applied; the appeal is dismissed.