27 Nov 1996
ULTRA ETERNAL LTD. v. LIU TAI CHEONG
- Citation
- ULTRA ETERNAL LTD. v. LIU TAI CHEONG
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Case number
- HCMP1188/1996
The First Requisition was validly raised and not satisfactorily answered because the will expressly vested the Building as specific gifts to beneficiaries and contained restrictions on disposition such that the executor lacked an unqualified power to sell absent beneficiaries' consent; the presumption that an executor acted in the discharge of duties was rebutted by the will and probate documents, so Defendant failed to show good title and Plaintiff was entitled to refund of the deposit with interest and costs. The Second Requisition was out of time but the Defendant's conduct in replying cou…