12 Jan 2026
HO KWAI WA 對 棉紡會中學法團校董會
- Citation
- [2026] HKDC 49
- Court
- District Court
- Case number
- DCEC1533/2023
Except for two discrete factual clarifications (questions (4) and (5)), the expert's report did not contain medical ambiguities requiring oral evidence; many of the applicant's queries arose from non-medical issues or misinterpretation of the report and can be resolved by the judge or by a written supplementary report. Given the likely disproportionate costs of oral expert attendance relative to the claim, the application to summon the expert was refused; respondent must instead seek written answers and a supplementary report from the expert within specified time limits. Applicant ordered to…