28 Oct 2013
CORAL SPRING INVESTMENTS LTD v. HONOR LEGEND LTD
- Citation
- CORAL SPRING INVESTMENTS LTD v. HONOR LEGEND LTD
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Case number
- HCMP1453/2013
The court refused to exercise its discretion to grant retrospective extensions because the applicants failed to show the defaults were inadvertent or adequately explained; the common, sparse, group‑wide justifications suggested indifference or an attempt to avoid compliance costs; multiple retrospective applications for listing require compelling justification which was not provided, therefore the originating summonses were dismissed.