10 Dec 2018
RE SHAHZAD AMIR
- Citation
- [2018] HKCA 915
- Court
- Court of Appeal
- Case number
- CACV127/2018
The application for leave to appeal was dismissed because the applicant failed to identify any question of great and general public importance under s22(1)(b) of Cap 484 and no basis existed under the "otherwise" limb; the applicant's bare assertion of risk on return and the Board's adverse factual findings (fabrication) did not justify granting leave.