2 Sept 2025
香港特別行政區 訴 黃綺霞及另三人
- Citation
- [2025] HKCFI 4043
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Case number
- HCMA102/2024
On a full re‑examination of the evidence the court concluded the trial judge correctly rejected the appellants' oral testimony as not credible or reasonably capable of constituting a reasonable excuse; documentary and inspection evidence proved prolonged non‑compliance with properly served s24 orders; therefore the prosecution proved the offences beyond reasonable doubt and the convictions must be upheld.