30 Apr 2019
The application for leave to appeal was dismissed because the applicant failed to demonstrate a reasonably arguable denial of fairness from lack of legal representation and failed to show the matter raised a question of great general or public importance as required by section 22(1)(b) Cap 484.
18 Jan 2019
The notice of motion was dismissed because the applicant failed to identify any question of great general or public importance under s22(1)(b) HKCFAO and thus did not satisfy the statutory threshold for leave to appeal to the Court of Final Appeal.
19 Dec 2018
The court refused to extend time and refused leave because the applicant was significantly delayed (over five months), offered no good and sufficient reason (ignorance of law not acceptable), the grounds were misconceived and not previously argued, and the statutory criteria in s22(1)(b) Cap 484 for leave were not met.