10 Jul 2018
RE RIZWAN alias RIZWAN GULISTAN
- Citation
- [2018] HKCA 382
- Court
- Court of Appeal
- Case number
- CACV244/2017
The application for extension of time and for leave to appeal was refused because the applicant's delay caused by ignorance of the 28‑day limit did not constitute very good grounds under s24(5) Cap 484, and because the issues advanced (lack of legal representation and BOR2 as a separate basis) did not raise reasonably arguable questions of great, general or public importance and were fact‑sensitive; accordingly leave was refused and the application dismissed.