7 Mar 2006
WONG YU CHO ROLLY t/a MARCO POLO AND ANOTHER v. INLAND REVENUE DEPARTMENT
- Citation
- WONG YU CHO ROLLY t/a MARCO POLO AND ANOTHER v. INLAND REVENUE DEPARTMENT
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Case number
- HCMP2032/2005
Leave to appeal was refused because the default judgment was regular (the master had ordered a 28-day extension and warned of judgment), the plaintiff failed to establish any binding agreement to suspend proceedings or to provide timely substantiating tax returns so the assessments were final under the IRO, and the plaintiff lacked a real prospect of success; absent error in principle the appellate court will not disturb the judge's discretion.