8 Jan 2024
香港特別行政區 訴 范敏怡
- Citation
- [2024] HKCFI 90
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Case number
- HCMA435/2022
The appeal is dismissed because the evidence (witness testimony and body‑worn CCTV) established the appellant was not wearing a mask or not wearing it properly at the relevant times; the appellant failed to discharge the evidential burden under reg 6(3) to show a lawful or reasonable excuse (no objective medical evidence of incapacity or serious distress and walking was not 'physically demanding'); the station platform was within the paid area so reg 4 applied; the imposition of additional fines and costs under Schedule 2 was lawful given the court's finding that the defences were frivolous o…