22 Jan 2026
香港特別行政區 訴 趙俊名 ANTHONY
- Citation
- [2026] HKDC 129
- Court
- District Court
- Case number
- DCCC424/2021
The court found that the prosecution had adduced sufficient prima facie evidence (timing of cheque encashment, seizure location, defendant's admissions and absence of legitimate records) to establish on a relative likelihood that the HK$220,000 was criminal proceeds, shifting the evidential burden to the putative owner; the owner failed to give a credible, reliable explanation or corroborative evidence to rebut the inference, so the court ordered forfeiture under s102 CPRO.