30 Jul 2019
香港特別行政區 訴 NURLAELA Dusja
- Citation
- [2019] HKCFI 1850
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Case number
- HCMA67/2019
The trial judge's assessment of witness credibility and inferences as to the appellant's intent were supported by evidence (taking money for a false promise, lack of means to arrange employment, and the nature of the partial repayment). There was no basis for appellate interference, so the convictions on counts 4 and 6 and the sentence were upheld.