29 Oct 2015
張家港市博雅貿易有限公司 v. ASD (HK) LTD
- Citation
- 張家港市博雅貿易有限公司 v. ASD (HK) LTD
- Court
- District Court
- Case number
- DCCJ2507/2014
The court held that the fraud exclusion did not apply because the plaintiff did not specifically plead fraud or dishonesty; on the merits, summary judgment was refused for the Brazilian Purchase Orders because triable issues of defective goods existed; summary judgment was granted conditionally for the Subsequent Peruvian Purchase Orders subject to the defendant paying HK$286,769.34 into court within 28 days, failing which judgment for US$36,765.30 will be entered; unconditional leave to defend was granted for the Brazilian Purchase Orders; costs to follow the condition (costs in the cause if…