29 Nov 2019
HKSAR v. CHICK WAI-HO
- Citation
- [2019] HKCFI 2899
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Case number
- HCMA415/2018
The court held that s52(3)(a) targets drivers whose subjective purpose in driving is to obtain reward derived from carriage of passengers (not necessarily via a direct agreement or actual payment) and that the Applicants' novel requirement of a direct contractual agreement with the passenger is unsupported by authority; constitutional challenges on overbreadth and Article 33 were not reasonably arguable on the facts and authorities, therefore the application for a certificate was dismissed.