30 Apr 2024
LCC v. LTLA
- Citation
- [2024] HKCA 406
- Court
- Court of Appeal
- Case number
- CACV281/2022
The Court allowed the appeal in part: the judge’s notional add‑back of HKD96,590,486 for gambling losses was set aside because W failed to prove by clear evidence that H’s conduct amounted to wanton or reckless dissipation causatively depleting the matrimonial pot; accordingly the matrimonial pool was recalculated and the lump sum payable by H was reduced to HKD266,264,000 with a revised payment timetable and specified costs orders.