23 Dec 2019
CHEUNG CHIU HON 對 HAN YAN TAO
- Citation
- [2019] HKCA 1433
- Court
- Court of Appeal
- Case number
- CAMP63/2018
Leave to appeal was refused because the defendant offered no credible explanation for the delay given she had legal representation at trial and had prepared an appeal record; the proposed fresh evidence failed Ladd v Marshall (not shown to be unobtainable with reasonable diligence, not credible on its face, and not likely to affect the outcome); allegations of bias and other grounds lacked any real prospect of success; the trial judge’s credibility and handwriting findings were not shown to be plainly wrong.