7 Jun 1996
R. v. TO YAT MING
- Citation
- R. v. TO YAT MING
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Case number
- HCMA385/1996
The magistrate correctly admitted and relied on the officer's testimony as non‑expert; the registration was properly identified via in‑court magnifying glass examination and corroborated by another witness; the overlay was part of certified equipment tested near the offence date and the officer's training provided independent support; identity was confirmed by licence and Transport Department records; and the presence of a notice outside the courtroom did not deny a public hearing — accordingly the appeal against conviction is dismissed.