29 Apr 2009
H v. S
- Citation
- H v. S
- Court
- Family Court
- Case number
- FCMP70/2008
Court accepted respondent's undertakings with amendments and held that these undertakings together with specific monetary orders constituted reasonable provision for T given the parties' means: order a lump sum of HK$333,520 (backdating and car), require respondent to procure purchase of suitable property up to HK$3.5m with at least 30% down within 3 months (mortgage to be paid up if he permanently leaves Hong Kong), require life insurance of HK$3m naming T as sole beneficiary until age 18 or completion of first full‑time tertiary education, award periodical payments of HK$47,500/month from 1…