16 Sept 2022
YEUNG TSZ CHUN v. COMMISSIONER OF POLICE
- Citation
- [2022] HKCA 1359
- Court
- Court of Appeal
- Case number
- CACV646/2020
Leave to adduce Implementation Evidence (affirmations about promulgation and measures ensuring Call-Sign and Alpha ID implementation) is granted despite failure to meet Condition 1 because exceptional circumstances and strong public interest justify departure from Ladd v Marshall; the Implementation Evidence is apparently credible and would probably have an important influence on the judge’s reasoning in §99. Updated CAPO statistical evidence is excluded because it does not substantially affect a basic assumption made at trial and admitting it would unduly undermine finality.