29 Oct 2018
The Court held the intended judicial review had no reasonable prospect of success on the known records of detriment ground, the Director had not misapplied the policy, and there were no other reasons in the interests of justice to grant leave under Section 14AA; accordingly leave was refused and the appeal struck out as incompetent and dismissed with costs.
9 Feb 2007
The court refused to hold the Respondent liable for costs incurred by the 2nd Applicant in proving the deceased's identity against the 1st Applicant because the identity dispute was occasioned by the competing applicants and not by the Respondent; the court varied certain costs orders to a common fund basis and ordered the Respondent to pay the 2nd Applicant's costs from the date of judgment to the date of the ruling and costs of the apportionment/payment out application; the court refused leave to appeal by the 1st Applicant because the appeal lacked a real prospect of success and the new ev…
21 May 1999
Application for review dismissed because no new cogent evidence was produced to warrant rescinding or varying the prior orders; material issues identified in the earlier judgment remained unexplained and the arranged fingerprint test was not attended, so exceptional circumstances required for review were not established.