27 Dec 2024
香港特別行政區 訴 劉振奮
- Citation
- [2025] HKCFI 559
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Case number
- HCMA235/2024
The appeal is dismissed because the sentencing judge correctly selected appropriate starting points (a short period for 21 days overstaying and the Usman Butt starting point for illegal employment), properly applied a one‑third plea reduction, lawfully ordered concurrent execution of sentences, and rejected the appellant's late assertions of coercion as not credible; no error of principle or manifest excess was shown.