16 Sept 2010
PETER GERARDUS VAN WEERDENBURG AND OTHERS v. HKSAR
- Citation
- PETER GERARDUS VAN WEERDENBURG AND OTHERS v. HKSAR
- Court
- Court of Final Appeal
- Case number
- FAMC44/2010
Leave to appeal was granted to the 1st applicant (Van Weerdenburg) limited to his convictions on Charges 1,2,9 and 10 under the substantial and grave injustice limb of s.32(2) because a dissent exposed a reasonably arguable departure from accepted norms in the trial court's consideration of material exculpatory evidence; leave was refused for the 2nd and 3rd applicants because there was no reasonable prospect the Court of Final Appeal would overturn the Court of Appeal's findings on alleged coaching or inadequate consideration of inconsistencies.