8 Jun 2009
CHAN KIN SHING SONNY v. INSIDER DEALING TRIBUNAL AND ANOTHER
- Citation
- CHAN KIN SHING SONNY v. INSIDER DEALING TRIBUNAL AND ANOTHER
- Court
- Court of Appeal
- Case number
- CACV360/2005
The Court dismissed the appeals: the IDT was not institutionally biased or inherently unfair; section 31(1)(b)'s leave requirement for factual appeals is not unconstitutional; the Tribunal's factual findings as to Koon and Sonny Chan were open on the evidence and properly reached; disqualification orders under section 23(1)(a) were valid without naming each company; disgorgement orders under section 23(1)(b) were valid and the appeals challenging them failed.