10 Aug 2012
NARIAN SAMTANI v. CHANDERSEN TIKAMDAS SAMTANI
- Citation
- NARIAN SAMTANI v. CHANDERSEN TIKAMDAS SAMTANI
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Case number
- HCA496/2011
No Mareva injunction was granted because there was insufficient evidence of real risk of dissipation and damages were an adequate remedy given the value of the properties; a limited preservation order was justified because some properties could bona fide be the subject matter of the partnership claim and something ought to be done to secure proceeds pending trial, subject to plaintiff fortifying his undertaking.