26 Jan 2018
MING CHIK PROPERTY INVESTMENT CO LTD v. GOOD TEAM INVESTMENT LTD AND ANOTHER
- Citation
- [2018] HKCFI 157
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Case number
- HCA2182/2017
The court found the plaintiff failed to establish that the 2nd defendant exercised control or was in possession of Shop 304 and that the alleged admissions and pre-action correspondence were protected by without prejudice privilege and therefore inadmissible; the plaintiff's remaining pleaded basis was factually insubstantial and amounted to an abuse of process, so the statement of claim was struck out and the inspection summons dismissed.