31 Oct 1997
BRIGHT-LINE ENTERPRISE COMPANY LIMITED v. MELODY PREMIER TECHNOLOGY LIMITED
- Citation
- BRIGHT-LINE ENTERPRISE COMPANY LIMITED v. MELODY PREMIER TECHNOLOGY LIMITED
- Court
- Court of Appeal
- Case number
- CACV164/1997
The defendant's defence that payment was conditional on the supply of spare parts was not credible on the contemporaneous documents and the parties' conduct, so summary judgment for US$32,785 was properly entered for the plaintiff; however, because the defendant's counterclaim arises from the same course of dealing and is not a sham, execution of the judgment should be stayed pending determination of the counterclaim to avoid potential unfairness.