Hong Kong Case Law: Decisions & Judgments | LexChat

Topic

Interest under high court ordinance s48

Legal area

Court

21 May 2015

ALL CHINA EXPRESS LTD v. SEE WAH FAN

Citation

ALL CHINA EXPRESS LTD v. SEE WAH FAN
Court

Court of First Instance
Case number

HCMP804/2015

Both summonses were dismissed because there was no mediation to engage the Mediation Ordinance and there was no amendment to pleadings to engage Order 20; consequently the summonses were wholly misconceived and leave to appeal out of time was refused because the intended appeal had no prospect of success and the application was totally without merit.
21 Mar 2000

NINTENDO OF AMERICA INC v. BUNG ENTERPRISES LTD.

Citation

NINTENDO OF AMERICA INC v. BUNG ENTERPRISES LTD.
Court

Court of First Instance
Case number

HCA1189/2000

The California judgment was final and conclusive under California law; the defendant had opportunities to set aside or challenge the judgment and failed to take timely steps; the default nature of the judgment did not bar enforcement in Hong Kong; there was no arguable breach of natural justice or triable issue raised; therefore summary judgment was appropriate to enforce the US$7,480,980 judgment with interest and costs.