13 Dec 2019
The applicant failed to show a serious issue to be tried and there was insufficient evidence of a real risk of further allotment of shares and no urgency; therefore the court declined to grant the interim interim injunction.
20 Jul 2018
The interim interim injunction was refused because the balance of fairness favoured refusal: the applicant delayed (action initiated nearly two years earlier and summons issued three days before hearing), the claimed urgency was unsupported, the evidential basis was indirect and speculative, damages appeared likely to be adequate for monetary subject matter, and there were unresolved Order 120 and party/standing issues affecting funds of the charitable 4th defendant which required fuller consideration.