20 Oct 1988
ATTORNEY GENERAL v. KO HON MAU, t/a KO\'S CONSTRUCTION CO
- Citation
- ATTORNEY GENERAL v. KO HON MAU, t/a KO\'S CONSTRUCTION CO
- Court
- Court of Appeal
- Case number
- CACV127/1988
Both clause 107 and clause 120 notices are provisional and may have interim effect; nothing in the contract justified treating a clause 107 notice as destroying an earlier bona fide clause 120 notice, and accordingly the contractor's clause 120 notice had interim specific validity entitling repossession and removal of the plant pending arbitration.