28 Nov 2013
LU JUN v. YU QI AND OTHERS
- Citation
- LU JUN v. YU QI AND OTHERS
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Case number
- HCCW282/2010
The summons was dismissed because the earlier costs order of 21 March 2013 had finally dealt with the costs of the proceedings, the issue of reserved costs had not been raised then, there was no clerical mistake to correct under Order 20 r 11, and the court was functus officio and lacked jurisdiction to grant the relief sought; additionally, interlocutory costs are not automatically subsumed within 'costs of the action.'