6 Jan 2003
WILLY FINE LTD. v. JANYET INVESTMENT LTD.
- Citation
- WILLY FINE LTD. v. JANYET INVESTMENT LTD.
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Case number
- HCA4430/2001
The struck-out portion of the Amended Reply was legally untenable and inconsistent with the plaintiff's claim for rescission because rescission had occurred upon the plaintiff's notice by writ; an interlocutory order for possession was justified because there was a strong prima facie case and a high probability the defendant would obtain possession at trial given uncontroverted facts (cessation of plaintiff's business, breaches and high arrears); the plaintiff's proposed amendment was refused because it lacked particulars and would cause delay.