27 Jul 2007
KAN KAM CHO AND ANOTHER v. KAN CHIU NAM RAYMOND AND ANOTHER
- Citation
- KAN KAM CHO AND ANOTHER v. KAN CHIU NAM RAYMOND AND ANOTHER
- Court
- Court of Appeal
- Case number
- CACV91/2005
Leave to appeal refused because the contested findings of fact were concurrent and specific to the case and therefore did not meet s22(1)(b)'s threshold of matters of great general or public importance, and the contested point of statutory interpretation had been addressed by the Court of Final Appeal such that granting leave was for that court, not this court.