22 Jan 2020
AU YEUNG, CHENG, HO & TIN (A FIRM) AND OTHERS v. AU YEUNG CHI SANG
- Citation
- [2020] HKCFI 224
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Case number
- HCA288/2014
The appeal is dismissed: the court found the plaintiffs had complied with Question 3(ii) by stating their methodology (average monthly net profit equated to fees earned) and supporting account records; interrogatories cannot force a party to concede a contested measure of damages; dismissal was disproportionate and unnecessary (relief from sanction would have been granted if required).