14 Jan 2016
張才奎所託管中國山水投資有限公司股份 AND ANOTHER v. 張才奎 AND ANOTHER
- Citation
- 張才奎所託管中國山水投資有限公司股份 AND ANOTHER v. 張才奎 AND ANOTHER
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Case number
- HCA623/2015
D1 failed to demonstrate the necessary legal interest or necessity under either limb of Order 15 r 6(2)(b): his alleged personal testimony was confined to denials without further evidence, the Striking Out Summonses concern solicitors' authority (CWL v KLG) not rights of D1, and any factual allegations could be addressed by calling D1 as a witness; inherent jurisdiction was not engaged; accordingly leave to intervene was refused and costs awarded against D1.