23 Jul 2012
BRISTLE LTD v. WONG TSUI CHING VENISA AND OTHERS
- Citation
- BRISTLE LTD v. WONG TSUI CHING VENISA AND OTHERS
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Case number
- HCA1094/2011
The single untested affirmation and absence of corroborative evidence on the pivotal factual issue (the date and circumstances of the convenor's appointment) meant the court could not safely invalidate the appointment or the meeting on interlocutory evidence; significant factual disputes require a full trial (or further evidence), therefore the plaintiff's Order 14/14A application must be dismissed and costs reserved to the trial judge.