13 Apr 2026
李成足 對 松美工程公司僱主許重暖及另一人
- Citation
- [2026] HKCFI 2040
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Case number
- HCPI810/2013
The four summons applications were dismissed as abusive, an impermissible attempt to reopen matters finally decided by trial and appeal (res judicata and functus officio), and on their face time‑barred; the court therefore exercised its inherent/common law and statutory powers to impose a further restriction order requiring leave of the nominated High Court judge before the plaintiff may bring any further applications in HCPI 810/2013, with detailed procedural safeguards.