31 Dec 2021
葉偉鴻及另一人 對 葉偉霖
- Citation
- [2021] HKCFI 3924
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Case number
- HCA225/2018
Court found plaintiffs failed to prove the 2013 transfer was a conditional gift or that a binding conditional agreement was made; the transfer document reflected the parties' chosen form and no clear enforceable post‑condition was expressed, so conditional gift and contractual breach claims failed. However the first plaintiff proved he relied on a false factual statement by the defendant (that the defendant did not own other property) inducing him to transfer his half‑share; that misrepresentation entitled the first plaintiff to rescind his half transfer. The mother’s property claims failed b…