30 Sept 2022
香港特別行政區 訴 黃騫緯
- Citation
- [2022] HKCFI 2935
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Case number
- HCMA489/2021
On a re‑hearing the court found the conviction unsafe because the magistrate both (a) failed adequately to accept or explain material inconsistencies (notably PW3's contemporaneous messages) and (b) intervened excessively when questioning DW1 in a manner that created a perception of partiality and resulted in improper rejection of defence alibi evidence; therefore the conviction was quashed.