3 Sept 2013
CHINLUCK PROPERTIES LTD v. APPEAL TRIBUNAL (BUILDINGS)
- Citation
- CHINLUCK PROPERTIES LTD v. APPEAL TRIBUNAL (BUILDINGS)
- Court
- Court of Appeal
- Case number
- CACV242/2012
The Court held the applicant failed to demonstrate a reasonably arguable ground for judicial review: the 1998 withdrawal letter did not create an unqualified legitimate expectation of compliance as it expressly reserved the BA's right to reissue orders if circumstances changed and the Blitz policy plus evidence of dilapidation constituted such changed circumstances; and there was no evidence of wholesale delegation to DTZ because DTZ acted as a consultant while the BA retained statutory decision-making; accordingly the BAT correctly summarily dismissed the appeals for lack of arguability.