16 Feb 2004
HO CHI CHING v. SAIKY CO LTD
- Citation
- HO CHI CHING v. SAIKY CO LTD
- Court
- District Court
- Case number
- DCEC149/2002
The 17 April 2002 document constituted a valid answer despite non‑compliance with Form 5 because it stated the substance and grounds of opposition; once a proper answer has been filed the court could not enter judgment on liability against the respondent merely because he failed to attend the first hearing, therefore the judgment dated 3 May 2002 was irregular and must be set aside.