12 Sept 2014
杭州日月電器股份有限公司 v. THE REGISTRAR OF COMPANIES AND OTHERS
- Citation
- 杭州日月電器股份有限公司 v. THE REGISTRAR OF COMPANIES AND OTHERS
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Case number
- HCMP653/2014
The court granted restoration because the Applicant demonstrated it was aggrieved and applied within the statutory 20‑year period and, on the evidence, had a bona fide claim; the court declined to decide the substantive dispute in this proceeding and held that absence of assets or insolvency is not a decisive reason to refuse restoration under the Ordinance.