12 Jan 2022
律政司司長 對 緯裕國際有限公司經營溢發五金
- Citation
- [2022] HKCFI 118
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Case number
- HCA557/2021
The summons was dismissed because the land had been lawfully resumed (rights terminated under the Lands Resumption Ordinance and the final judgment), the appellants failed to disclose any legal basis for an order directing the plaintiff to provide housing or assistance, there was no jurisdiction in the resumption proceeding to grant the relief sought, and the appellants had had reasonable time to seek advice; accordingly the appeal is dismissed and costs awarded to the plaintiff.