5 Aug 2005
KGL v. CKY AND ANOTHER
- Citation
- KGL v. CKY AND ANOTHER
- Court
- Family Court
- Case number
- FCMC1453/2002
The court found that three of the four challenged service orders (dispensing with personal service, substituted service by advertisement, and dispensing with service of a late affidavit) were ineffective because there was no evidence the 2nd Respondent had notice; those service failures rendered the resulting disposition orders irregular. Exercising jurisdiction under RHC (including O.35 r.2 with extension and O.2(2) for irregularity), the court set aside the parts of the disposition and service orders affecting the 2nd Respondent and ordered a re-hearing because the 2nd Respondent had real p…