22 Feb 2019
RE CAI SUI RONG
- Citation
- [2019] HKCFI 514
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Case number
- HCB2859/2018
Crossexamination was ordered limited to domicile and place of residence because those are jurisdictional facts turning on the respondent's subjective intention and explanations for objective indicators recorded in evidence; the bank is entitled to test those assertions in person. Crossexamination was refused on the timing of the respondent's knowledge of the statutory demand because rule 46 of the Bankruptcy Rules focuses on whether the creditor took all reasonable steps to bring the demand to the debtor's attention, not on when the debtor actually became aware of it, and the bank did not sho…