28 Aug 2009
AU WAI MING AND ANOTHER v. KAM TZE MING ALFRED AND ANOTHER
- Citation
- AU WAI MING AND ANOTHER v. KAM TZE MING ALFRED AND ANOTHER
- Court
- Court of Appeal
- Case number
- CACV278/2008
Leave to appeal was refused because the estoppel question did not properly arise in the appealed judgments, the Defendants failed to demonstrate a virtual certainty that unliquidated damages would exceed HK$1,000,000 (so the monetary gateway was not met), costs are irrelevant to subject-matter valuation, and the Defendants did not meet the high threshold required to show a departure from precedent warranting final appeal.